To the Editor: In response to Enrique Landa's column ("Retrospection before creation," The Daily Pennsylvanian, 11/14/00), I do not believe that the exclusion of Fine Arts courses from the General Requirement is an injustice to the students' "diverse education." First off, it is up to the students to pursue a diverse education -- if one wants to take photography, than one should do it, regardless of what requirement it does or does not fulfill. Because Fine Arts classes are small and intense, it would be awful to pollute them with students who simply want to "fulfill a requirement." They should be taken by students who are genuinely interested in mastering the subject matter. In this way, the current situation actually allows for higher quality classes. A friend of mine is a Fine Arts major, and he agreed with me, saying that all of the students in his classes are not concerned with fulfilling Sector VII of the General Requirement -- they are appropriately concerned with Fine Arts. Steve Davis Wharton/Engineering '01
The Daily Pennsylvanian is an independent, student-run newspaper. Please consider making a donation to support the coverage that shapes the University. Your generosity ensures a future of strong journalism at Penn.
DonateMore Like This
You’re probably not who you think you are
By
Luna Bouhairi
·
June 21, 2026
Penn is risking student safety to cover its own mistakes
By
Mritika Senthil
·
June 7, 2026
Weed-out classes kill curiosity
By
Zoe Mackey
·
May 24, 2026
The Penn complex
By
Gloria Oladejo
·
May 18, 2026





