To the Editor: In response to Enrique Landa's column ("Retrospection before creation," The Daily Pennsylvanian, 11/14/00), I do not believe that the exclusion of Fine Arts courses from the General Requirement is an injustice to the students' "diverse education." First off, it is up to the students to pursue a diverse education -- if one wants to take photography, than one should do it, regardless of what requirement it does or does not fulfill. Because Fine Arts classes are small and intense, it would be awful to pollute them with students who simply want to "fulfill a requirement." They should be taken by students who are genuinely interested in mastering the subject matter. In this way, the current situation actually allows for higher quality classes. A friend of mine is a Fine Arts major, and he agreed with me, saying that all of the students in his classes are not concerned with fulfilling Sector VII of the General Requirement -- they are appropriately concerned with Fine Arts. Steve Davis Wharton/Engineering '01
The Daily Pennsylvanian is an independent, student-run newspaper. Please consider making a donation to support the coverage that shapes the University. Your generosity ensures a future of strong journalism at Penn.
DonateMore Like This
Andy Mei | In times of tragedy, actions speak louder than words
By
Andy Mei
·
Dec. 18, 2025
Ady Lotivio | You are networking wrong
By
Ady Lotivio
·
Dec. 9, 2025
Joshua Daugherty | Why is my grade at risk when I’m sick?
By
Joshua Daugherty
·
Dec. 9, 2025
Simar Soni | Zohran Mamdani: Philadelphia’s lesson in coalition
By
Simar Soni
·
Dec. 9, 2025
Roshan Gopal | Politicians are misguided on violence
By
Roshan Gopal
·
Dec. 9, 2025
Zaid Alsubaiei | We grew up too fast
By
Zaid Alsubaiei
·
Dec. 9, 2025






