"The resolutions are grouped as we are unable to continue," Board of Trustees Chair Ramanan Raghavendran said.

Columnist Akiva Berkowitz questions the wisdom of releasing a standalone artificial intelligence major and asks whether it can truly justify its existence.

Also, administrators announced a tuition hike at a trustee meeting.

SCUE is the first branch of student government to issue a public statement on academic freedom since the University’s leadership crisis began last fall.

Academic Policy Committee Chair David Ertel led the voting process for the resolutions, which each passed unanimously and without discussion. 

Wharton and Engineering junior Noah Rubin spoke at the Feb. 28 roundtable alongside students from eight other universities.

At the event at Steinberg-Dietrich Hall, Schlesinger shared how Roots is seeking to create mutual trust and solidarity amid escalating tensions over conflict in the West Bank. 

Penn's United Minorities Council co-hosted their annual cultural fair event with the Class of 2027 board on Feb. 28 in Houston Hall.

The symposium, which lasts from Feb. 29 to March 2, features a variety of faculty, scholars, and alumni across GSWG, FGT, and PWS. 

This year, Van Pelt Library curated a ten-piece collection of books and DVDs that highlight Black authors and filmmakers, with topics ranging from jazz music to community activism.

The discussion, hosted by center director and sociology professor Hyunjoon Park, centered on Han's experience embracing her identity as a Korean-American and her fight against Asian hate through the lens of broadcast journalism. 

Residents have celebrated the dorm’s strong sense of community while describing ongoing challenges with amenities and the dorm selection process.

The Penn Board of Trustees approved a 3.9% tuition hike for the 2024-25 academic year.

Columnist Eric Najera argues Penn must address meal plan price and quality issues.

Also, the Penn & Slavery Project's fight for recognition.

According to a Feb. 27 press release, five students received a memo that their involvement in the study-in was grounds for "disciplinary proceedings." 

The documents reveal that the hearing board decided to conduct Wax’s case as one of “flagrant unprofessional conduct by a faculty member.”