James Lee

The fall semester is just about to end and a lot has happened that has left lasting impressions and changes on this campus.

You should not and do not need to believe that Penn is perfect. You should not love it unconditionally. You only need to love it enough to believe that it is worth saving.

An education not only teaches but molds, and we ought to remember the forces that shape us into ourselves.

Do we need a major overhaul of the UC or does the UC just have a brand problem?

In general, how can student activist groups lobby Penn's administration effectively in order to promote change? 

As diverse as Penn is, I feel safe in saying that the drive to succeed is one of the few qualities that unite us as a community. 

Inclusion in discussion and class participation is obviously a noble goal, but the notion that race and gender are appropriate criteria to decide who gets a voice is at best a misguided one.

Is Penn filling up too much of its classes through early decision? Should there be any changes to Penn's admissions policies with regards to early decision?

When is the last time that we’ve heard from a politician or a public figure challenging the legitimacy of the Second Amendment itself?

Do you believe that the task force efforts to combat sexual violence and substance abuse are currently misguided with regards to events monitoring?