To the Editor: To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time sheTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the UniversityTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCETo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairperson To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination? To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend theTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts toTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as aTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should haveTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theUniversity's policy on non- discrimination. Are they making every effort to do soTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theUniversity's policy on non- discrimination. Are they making every effort to do sowhen their organization is all female? When asked why there were only femaleTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theUniversity's policy on non- discrimination. Are they making every effort to do sowhen their organization is all female? When asked why there were only femalemembers, a group member answered (I paraphrase), I have been to every meeting,To the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theUniversity's policy on non- discrimination. Are they making every effort to do sowhen their organization is all female? When asked why there were only femalemembers, a group member answered (I paraphrase), I have been to every meeting,no men have come out. In my opinion, the onus is on all student groups to makeTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theUniversity's policy on non- discrimination. Are they making every effort to do sowhen their organization is all female? When asked why there were only femalemembers, a group member answered (I paraphrase), I have been to every meeting,no men have come out. In my opinion, the onus is on all student groups to makepeople of any gender or race feel welcome. No where in Generation XX's publicationTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theUniversity's policy on non- discrimination. Are they making every effort to do sowhen their organization is all female? When asked why there were only femalemembers, a group member answered (I paraphrase), I have been to every meeting,no men have come out. In my opinion, the onus is on all student groups to makepeople of any gender or race feel welcome. No where in Generation XX's publicationdoes it say that men are welcome to come to meetings, or to contribute. I wouldTo the Editor: I am responding to the editorial "Ignoring Students" (DP 12/5/95) expressing theopinion that President Judith Rodin should make more of an effort to reach out toher main constituents, the graduate, professional and undergraduate students thatmake Penn a great university. While I wholeheartedly agree that the president should try to increase the time shespends talking with students, I also think that your editorial does not give PresidentRodin full credit for the efforts she does make to get input from representatives ofthe student body. Every month, both the president and provost spend several hours in meetings withrepresentatives of the Graduate and Professional Assembly and the UndergraduateAssembly. In monthly University Council, meetings, for example, the president andprovost receive advice on the daily and long-term management of the Universityfrom representatives from Penn's student body, administration, faculty and otherconstituencies. This consultative body has few peers among top universities. President Rodin, and many senior officials in her administration, have also let meknow personally on several occasions that their doors are always open to discussany concerns of students. While I would like to see more regular, scheduled,exclusive meetings with student leaders, I think the president does deserve creditfor the efforts she has made to build bridges with student government organizationsat Penn. VICTOR PRINCEWharton graduate studentGraduate and ProfessionalStudent Assembly chairpersonIs it Discrimination?To the Editor: I was handed a copy of Generation XX today on Locust Walk. I commend themagazine for some very interesting and informative articles. However, a deeperview of the publication shows that Generation XX is not making adequate efforts tostay in compliance with the University's non-discrimination policy. A quick look at Generation XX's Staff shows 19 members, all of whom are female.There is one article in the entire publication written by a male, Eric Austin, but forsome reason he is not listed in the publication as a member of the staff or as awriter. When questioned about this problem, Generation XX Editor-in-Chief ColleenMastony replied that, "He should have been listed." No question...he should havebeen. As a SAC and University funded group, Generation XX must comply with theUniversity's policy on non- discrimination. Are they making every effort to do sowhen their organization is all female? When asked why there were only femalemembers, a group member answered (I paraphrase), I have been to every meeting,no men have come out. In my opinion, the onus is on all student groups to makepeople of any gender or race feel welcome. No where in Generation XX's publicationdoes it say that men are welcome to co
The Daily Pennsylvanian is an independent, student-run newspaper. Please consider making a donation to support the coverage that shapes the University. Your generosity ensures a future of strong journalism at Penn.
Donate
