Search Results


Below are your search results. You can also try a Basic Search.




Ahead of the learning CURF

(11/22/00 10:00am)

Penn is a research institution. While this sentence is often used to excuse poor teaching at the University, it also provides opportunities to undergraduates that may not come at some of the smaller liberal arts colleges in America. The first advantage of being a research institution is research's enhancement to the classroom experience. Every professor we may bemoan as "too focused on research" is actually in the vocation of creating new knowledge for your 10:30 lecture. Rather than reciting by rote facts learned and proved by others, our distinguished faculty constantly pushes the frontier of knowledge so that classroom learning can be an ever-advancing experience. The second advantage is one of the best-kept secrets of Penn: You can do the same thing. Independent studies, work-study jobs and programs like the University Scholars exist to give undergraduates a chance to work either independently or with faculty members in active learning. Deputy Provost Peter Conn says that undergraduate research is among his office's highest priorities. The advent of the Center for Undergraduate Research and Fellowships, located in the former Christian Association building at 3601 Locust Walk, helps meet this priority by providing a way for more undergraduates to do better research than ever before. So far, the center has consolidated some of the University's pre-existing research and fellowship loci. By combining Director Art Casciato -- whose efforts as Harrison College House dean have made him a campus legend -- with staff from the General Honors program, the Office for International Programs and Speaking Across the University, CURF can offer a number of programs under one roof. The center will alert undergraduates to research opportunities inside and outside the University, help undergraduates in crafting and refining research proposals, link undergraduates to research funding and aid them in the construction of their final research output. This model, unique to Penn, also helps undergraduates secure prestigious post-graduate fellowships, such as the Rhodes and Fulbright. By fostering a culture of research, Penn is putting its undergraduates at a natural advantage to students from our peer institutions. This list, however, is not exhaustive of CURF's potential. The center can become a key to linking students with campus faculty and resources to aid them in their research goals. It can take any Penn undergraduate with an inkling to conduct significant research and point him in the proper direction and help him all along the way. But to accomplish this, CURF needs two things from you. The first is your advice. The Nominations and Elections Committee will be accepting applications to serve on the center's student advisory board on Wednesday, November 29, from noon to 6 p.m. in Room 207 of Houston Hall. With the center still in its formative stages, this committee will be key to setting the center's priorities and structure. CURF can best serve your research needs only if your needs are identified. Serving on the student advisory board is your best opportunity to substantively identify your campus' needs. The board will be composed of a student in each undergraduate school as well as a representative from the Benjamin Franklin Scholars and University Scholars programs. To apply, simply follow the instructions found at http://dolphin.upenn.edu/~nec/. This is an incomparable opportunity to define the role undergraduate research will play at Penn for years to come. The second thing CURF needs is your business. Advisors with no clientele do no service to themselves or to the University. Help the University's research community and your own education by going into the center and talking to someone. No matter how unstructured or how undersized your desire to do research, do yourself the favor of seeing what the University has to help you meet that desire. In doing so, you allow yourself to learn through active, unique processes. You also help this research university form a culture of researching undergraduates.


GUEST COLUMNISTS: A vote for progress

(04/20/99 9:00am)

Today, the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences will vote on a proposal to test an experimental curriculum, beginning with 200 students in the Class of 2004. Over the past semester, we have worked with the Committee on Undergraduate Education to formulate the pilot program, which we believe improves upon the existing General Requirement in several important respects. Some have asked if 10 courses can realistically be condensed into four. The answer is, of course, no. The four-course sequence at the heart of the CUE proposal does not represent a an attempt to condense the existing General Requirement but an effort to redefine the purpose of the requirement. The new courses aim to introduce students to a spectrum of ideas and perspectives and move away from the notion that knowledge can be neatly categorized or bounded. The goal is to spark the interest of students in both disciplines and interdisciplinary perspectives that they may wish to explore further. And by cutting the required 10 courses to four, the pilot program gives students the ability to pursue interests to a greater extent than was previously possible. Students can use those six course slots to explore the offerings of a particular department in depth, pursue interdisciplinary courses of study or simply experiment. The course sequence also aims to introduce students to the conflicts that exist within the spectrum of knowledge, both between the ways that different disciplines examine subjects and within academic disciplines. The CUE proposal also provides for multiple avenues of inquiry. In addition to investigating natural science, social science and humanities phenomena from a variety of disciplinary perspectives, the four course categories all make mention of the need to understand the tensions and conflicts -- produced by both social context and academic discourse -- inherent in the processes of creating and applying knowledge. Examples of this approach in the proposed curriculum may include teaching students about the conflicts between slavery and democracy, nuclear power and nuclear holocaust, and theology and cosmology. Such multidisciplinary exploration exemplifies the approach espoused by CUE; the need to establish a reflective learning process is a critical component of the proposal. The proposed curriculum will also introduce students to the idea of disciplinary knowledge: the idea that the way historians understand a given period, economists a recession or physicists the universe is a product of an ongoing debate in an academic community where various perspectives are represented. The importance of interdisciplinary study in the pilot curriculum extends beyond the introductory four-course sequence. In calling for students to explore ideas from two or more angles via minors, dual majors, abroad programs or thematic semesters, CUE has moved to inject excitement into the General Requirement over considerations of starting salary after graduation. Students, rather than being forced into learning for their resumZ's sake, are to be given the encouragement, advising and class resources to learn for learning's sake. This may not work. But the experiment is worth the effort. A pilot program, carefully evaluated for five years for a limited number of students, has the tremendous potential to tell us things about our current system, help us develop possibilities for future schemas and provide insight into the very way in which we have and would like to learn. The faculty and staff on the committee have developed a framework in which this effort can begin. College faculty should realize that it is by no means the end of a process but rather a well-thought-out beginning.