Search Results


Below are your search results. You can also try a Basic Search.




GUEST COLUMN: Beyond Appearance - Women Who Are Truly Beautiful

(10/24/94 9:00am)

When a woman, and especially a feminist, enters a conversation on appearance, the expectation is that she will point to stick-thin fashion models and painted-on "natural looking" make-up. In fact, I could point to volumes of literature, from Naomi Wolf's The Beauty Myth to Judith Rodin's academic work on body image, which detail the damage done to women in this society by those who would have them believe that the presentation of a socially acceptable appearance is the primary purpose of their existence. It is impossible to understate the damage that is done to young girls, who are bombarded with media and popular images of disproportionately shaped women (like Barbie) with pert little noses and collagen-injected lips, blue eyes, and blonde hair. When girls are taught to hate their bodies, they grow up with more than a crisis of confidence. When normal, healthy, natural, beautiful bodies are reviled as ugly because not enough effort has been put into them, the minds of women are discounted, their lives devalued. Anorexia and bulimia are killing people, especially women. This is not because women are somehow inferior to men. Quite the reverse, I suppose it's a credit to women that a multi-billion industry had to be created to take their energies away from actually thinking and focus them on starvation-dieting and face painting. I don't want to take away from the seriousness of the health issues surrounding eating disorders -- about the destructive nature of the "beauty myth" -- but, in a way, I want to look beyond this for a moment. I could write about all of these issues at great length, about all the damage done by the "beauty" industry. I could point to all the offensive things that are said and written about women and their physical appearances. But, now, instead of looking at the way women are objectified every day, I chose to point, with pride, to the women who overcome that objectification every day. These are the role model who offer hope to those who are still trapped by the "beauty myth." I choose to take this opportunity to celebrate those everyday role models who manage to get their daily business done, sometimes (heaven forbid!), while wearing jeans, sweatshirts, and (gasp!) no make-up. My initial temptation, in writing this, was to point to all of the women I know on this campus who, like me, are leaders of organizations and who, not exactly like me, are exemplary scholars. I wanted to spotlight them as examples as women "above" superficiality. Sitting down to think about this, though, I realized that to focus on a few extraordinary women, like reading history in terms of only a few great men, misses the reality of day-to-day life, the totality of experience. It is true that an accent on women's physical appearance insults the extraordinary women who devote themselves to improving the lives of others. But, perhaps even more so, it insults every woman who gets up in the morning, walks to class, and spends time in her own education. I don't make choices about my appearance based upon how men will receive them -- I wish I didn't have to tell people that. And, I would hope that I had already sufficiently demonstrated that it is my brain, and not an ovum, which governs my behavior. But, I am frequently reminded that these concepts are still alien to a few of my fellow students. Perhaps I'm over-sensitive. Perhaps it shouldn't offend me to be reminded that if I want to catch a man (and why else would I be here?), I had better get up early, style my hair, and paint my face. Perhaps it shouldn't offend me that a man thinks I might desire him simply because of my overwhelming need to procreate and not to waste any of my precious "eggs." Historically, all kinds of efforts have been made to keep women from thinking about matters of substance. In the bad old days, it was believed that a woman using her brain too much would cause her uterus to shrivel up. From corsets which broke ribs and caused respiratory disorders to high-maintenance beehive hairdos, the beauty industry has damaged women's health, mental and physical, along with absorbing their money and time. I am proud of the women I have come to know here at Penn because they chose to focus on academics, on community service, on social action, on culture -- on any number of things. They are brilliant, creative, diverse women. And make no mistake, they are beautiful women. Their beauty lies in the work they do, in the meaning they have given their lives, in what they do for themselves and for one another. And so, when even one man decides that the purpose of women here is something other than to get an education, he fails to grasp the meaning behind these women's lives. He fails to understand the significance of the intellectual and cultural contributions that have been made by women. When even one man believes that he is entitled to demand that women at Penn meet his criteria for physical attractiveness, he denies the reality of an institution that has thrived in its years of "coeducation." He insults every woman who decides for herself what she will wear and how she will look. He insults every woman at Penn who works, studies, and lives her own life. Debra Pickett is a senior English major from Franklin Township, New Jersey and a member of the leadership team of the Penn Women's Alliance.


OPINION: SPEAK FOR YOURSELF: Women's Center: Valuable Resource or PC Token?

(02/23/94 10:00am)

Don't be Afraid To Call yourself A Feminist In her 1991 bestseller, Backlash, Susan Faludi discusses the New Right's strategy for attacking the feminist agenda. She writes: "In time-honored fashion, antifeminist male leaders had enlisted women to handle the heavy lifting in the campaign against their own rights." I did not want to write this column. I did not want to allow the media to continue to frame the debate over the Women's Center's move to Locust Walk as one between opposing groups of women. It's difficult for me to address the assertions of people who have never been to the Penn Women's Center. I'm sorry that they believe that if they went to the PWC, they'd be unwelcome. I'm sorry that the antifeminists on this campus have convinced them that if they opened the door to 119 Houston Hall, they'd be assaulted by the 50 militant radicals who are holed up there. Perhaps they feel that the PWC is a feminist organization and they have no use for feminism. Perhaps they've never felt unsafe on this campus at night and never known anyone who was sexually assaulted. Perhaps they plan on living their lives without learning the phrases "sexual harassment" or "pay gap." In their world, feminism must seem pretty outdated. Or perhaps they think they'll be safer if they don't identify themselves with "radicals", that the misogynist backlash on this campus will only hurt them if they call themselves "feminists." So, they're willing to give up using the Women's Center as a resource because other people have led them to believe that it addresses issues only from the "radical" point of view of the 50 scary women we've heard so much about in the press. I have no idea where this magic number came from. Clearly, it did not come from the PWC's annual report, since that report documents that 178 people were served by the PWC's one-on-one counseling and advocacy service alone, last year. Clearly, it did not come from the number of undergraduate women, 250, who actively participate in "feminist" organizations. If they chose never to walk into the Women's Center, that's fine with me. But if the time comes that they need counseling, advocacy, or support on any issue, the PWC will be there for them. And they will be welcomed. The counseling and advocacy that is the day to day work of the PWC is not the kind of activity that makes headlines. The Women's Center respects the privacy of the groups and individuals with which it deals and does not attempt to promote itself in the media. This has allowed those in the antifeminist backlash to define what the PWC is and what it does. In moving to 3643 Locust Walk, the PWC moves from a closet-sized space in Houston Hall to the center of campus. In many ways, bringing women to the center of campus is what the PWC has always been about. That is why its relocation is so frightening to those who would keep women "in their place". That is why those very same people want women to believe that the Women's Center has not adequately represented our interests. If you have been convinced of this, I would urge you to make your feelings known, not just through the voices of DP reporters, but directly to the Women's Center staff. You will not be asked for your religion or your political affiliation when you walk in the door. You do not have to call yourself a feminist to have your voice heard. I urge you to put aside what campus antifeminists have told you and come and judge for yourself. Here are the PWC's issues of concern, listed alphabetically (These are listed in the informational brochure, available on the coffee table next to the entrance door of the Women's Center, in case you are brave enough to venture there.): Acquaintance rape, AIDS, Assertiveness, Child Care, Disability rights, Economics, Educational equity, Health, International Women's issues, Lesbian and bisexual concerns/homophobia, Racial harassment/racism, Relationships, Reproductive health, Safety and security, Sexual harassment/sexism, Tenure, Violence against women, Women and athletics, and Worker rights and responsibilities. Campus antifeminists didn't want you to see this list. They wanted to scare you away from even walking in to pick it up. Debra Pickett is a junior English major from Franklin Township, New Jersey. She is a former DP columnist and member of the Penn Women's Alliance leadership team.